Jim views property rights as part of one's natural rights. I view property "laws" as equal to the infamous "social contract" ... as generally agreed on arbitrary social constructs. This valuation I make leaving out moral judgements. Perhaps that is a mistake. Jim's beliefs about personal and property rights are deeply tied to morality. What is right is right. If there is no moral relitiveism then, it follows that there is a "natural" law, natural rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment